Denys Vlasenko schrieb: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Rob Landley<[email protected]> wrote: >> I've had infrastructure for that toybox for over a year. I have a big todo >> item to port as much of the toybox infrastructure as I can back into BusyBox, >> it's just not at the top of my todo list yet and it's a big thing I'll have >> to >> do in stanges (and several bits of which are kind of intrusive requiring >> documentation, explanation of the rationale, and probably extensive >> discussion). >> >> First question: is the current test suite more closely maintained than the >> documentation directory? > > Yes. Regressions are not allowed (meaning, they are checked > and fixed, it is not bit rotting). > >> (Is there somebody specific caring for it, or just >> "when the maintainer has spare time"?) > > I don't remember anyone specifically focusing on > just a part of busybox. >
I do not know about your rights on busybox.net. Is it possible to have nightly/Weekly build and run the test-suit against it ? that could help to find problems especialy in last-minute-fixes. re, wh _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
