On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 09:00:23AM -0700, Cathey, Jim wrote: >>Perhaps an insane idea of using floating point for this is not >>totally insane after all... one day molecular/atomic storage may >>overshoot even 128-bit integers 8) > >Where inexact answers are acceptable, so is floating point.
>Here it looks like it's just the bigness of numbers that's >glazing over the eyes. One could make a slight case for >3.235 TB as a printed result, or perhaps just some commas >in a big integer... time to depend fdisk on gmp/mpfr ? :P _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
