On 02/04/2010, at 2:50 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On Friday 02 April 2010 01:14, Steve Bennett wrote: >>> This treats creation actions as deletions too - it will >>> delete the device node if it exist. This is confusing. >> >> Possibly. What does delete even mean when the "create" action >> is to not create the device node? > > Delete will (try to) delete the node. > Users which created the node by some other mechanism > won't like to find their nodes nuked by mdev. > >>> Maybe you should set major = -1 instead? >> >> That is probably fine too. >>> >>> And why do you disallow command in this case? >>> It might be useful. >> >> Possibly. It seemed confusing to me to run a command >> on create/delete of a device node which is just being >> ignored. Can you think of a real use case, or do you >> just like the symmetry of it? > > I just don't see why would I want to remove that > possibility - it's doesn't cost anything in terms of code size. > > I implemented "!" in current git, please test.
Works for me. Thanks. Steve -- µWeb: Embedded Web Framework - http://uweb.workware.net.au/ _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
