>> 2. Linux kernel will attempt to update RTC at 500ms mark and > not at a second mark. Do they known something better? >Perhaps they thought this minimizes average error in setting >RTC time.
Perhaps most RTC-reading ends up on a 1-second mark, and thus moving the writing avoids conflicts that at best result in a delay of the write? Just guessing. -- Jim _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
