On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 14 April 2010 11:37:45 Cathey, Jim wrote: >> I would _really_ hate >> to see them all crapped up with half-implemented junk that let >> them build anyway, but didn't even try to let them run correctly. >> That's like painting over rot. > > +1 > > Making busybox work under mingw or on Gnu/Hurd/Dammit strikes me as sort of > pointless, but if somebody's interested then somebody's interested. > > However, crapping all over the common code for these use cases is uncool. > Please only merge any of this if it can be done _cleanly_.
I have sent the first part in mailing list. Please have a look and feed back. Your (all subscribers of busybox@) input would be valueable for me to update the rest. -- Duy _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
