On Fri, 14 May 2010, Rob Landley wrote: > On Friday 14 May 2010 15:57:34 Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > > > > Yes. Horrid obfuscation. > > By the way, if you were making the argument "this should work under > busybox's own shells", I'd be all for it. You could even make a > standards argment around SUSv4.
I'll hold my breath :) > But making the argument "this should comply with Ubuntu's design > mistakes", such as replacing the gcc binary with a perl wrapper (yes > really, check Ubuntu 8.10)... No, I'm not making that argument. Aren't we diverging from the subject? Weren't you running an ubuntu (flawed desingn) box? Cheers, -- Cristian _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
