On Monday 17 May 2010 02:23, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Saturday 15 May 2010 17:27:40 Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > I had a look through and found:
> >
> > ,----[ individual ]
> >
> > | possible bashism in individual line 15 (brace expansion):
>
> He changed the start to #!/bin/bash and you're still looking for bashisms.
>
> If you keep on with this, I'm going to go through and try to optimize every
> shells cript in the project with as many intentional obscure bashisms as
> possible. (Keep in mind dash doesn't even support thing/{one,two} syntax.
> it's not hard to make the scripts smaller and simpler by filling them with
> things dash can't cope with.)
OMG >:D
> I'm warning you to drop this topic. I don't have a stubborn streak, I have a
> vindictive streak. It has a very high activation threshold, and most things
> I
> don't care enough to do anyhing about. But once the straw breaks the camel's
> back you go in the Bruce Fucking Perens category and I remain 100% opposed to
> your very existence years later.
Hey Rob, please do abstain from biting our contributors. :)
--
vda
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
