On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 07:53:00 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 02:53:55 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > >> On Tuesday 06 July 2010 13:48, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > archival/unzip_doc.txt.bz2 looks like a strange thing to have in a source > >> > tree and it seems that the distribution terms for it are unclear. Perhaps > >> > it might as well be removed? > >> > >> Why bother? It's useful whenever I hack on unzip. > > > > Is it really more useful than googling the same bit? I wouldn't say that, > > for example, having OMAP referentce manual in the linux kernel source tree > > would be any more helpful when I hack on omap kernel than having it stored > > separately. > > > > Our lawyers tell me that in order to distribute busybox in the context of > > maemo I have to remove this file due to its questionable distribution terms. > > Lawyers. Don't we all love them?
As long as they are on our side. :) > > I thought then this will be useful for the mainline busybox as well since > > noone wants questionable things in their source distributions. Just my 2 > > cents. > > Removed from git. Thanks. Regards, -- Alex _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
