On Thursday 16 September 2010 18:38, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote: > > > > Better to always accept both \n and \r\n as valid > > How to distinguish \r being a part _of the real data_ from \r being a > part of CRNL then?
Similar question: "How to distinguish \r\n being a part of the real data from \r\n being a part of CRNL?" Answer to both: no way to do that. Email was not designed to be a binary-transparent protocol. That's why uuenciode and base64 were invented. Therefore stripping all \r which are directly followed by \n is not going to create problems. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
