On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 06:33:50 -0500, Matthew Stoltenberg wrote: > > Why do you need it? (I ask because sometimes there _is_ a valid, > > but unknown to me, reason to have this or that tool in bbox). > > I will vouch that a lot of debian based systems seem to break if you > don't have /etc/shells setup correctly. Several releases of > MontaVista exhibit this behaviour. > > A more useful option may be to have an optional /etc/shells file that > a busybox install sets up with the currently included shells. Just my > 2 cents.
I have a debian based system as well and depending on a configuration (like, testing/development/production/etc images) it can have different shells installed. Besides, users may choose to install additional shells. So having a pre-defined /etc/shells won't work in all cases. Regards, -- Alex _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
