>> > I still viscerally cringe when I see while (1) instead of for(;;). I'm >> > aware >> > that modern optimizers take it out, but when there is a way to state >> > exactly >> > what you want the code to do and you choose to instead say something you >> > _don't_ want the code to actually look like, I don't understand why. Oh >> > well. >> >> I'm interested in this point, but can't find any arguments or discussion >> on the for(;;) vs while(1) issue. It is just a style preference, i.e., >> a religious issue? > > Yes. > >> I have seen for(;;) promoted over while(1), but why? > > No reason. So it never mattered or doesn't matter now? :) _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
- bunzip2 fails to decompress pbzip2-compressed files Dan Fandrich
- Re: bunzip2 fails to decompress pbzip2-compressed... Denys Vlasenko
- Re: bunzip2 fails to decompress pbzip2-compre... Dan Fandrich
- Re: bunzip2 fails to decompress pbzip2-compre... Rob Landley
- OT: for(;;) vs while(1) Ken Irving
- Re: OT: for(;;) vs while(1) Denys Vlasenko
- Re: OT: for(;;) vs while(1) Matthew Stoltenberg
- Re: OT: for(;;) vs while(1) Denys Vlasenko
- Re: OT: for(;;) vs while... Bob Dunlop
- Re: OT: for(;;) vs while... Denys Vlasenko
- Re: bunzip2 fails to decompress pbzip2-co... Denys Vlasenko
- Re: OT bunzip2 fails to decompress pb... Tito
- Re: OT bunzip2 fails to decompre... Denys Vlasenko
- Re: OT bunzip2 fails to deco... Tito
- Re: OT bunzip2 fails to ... Denys Vlasenko
- Re: OT bunzip2 fails to ... Tito
- Re: bunzip2 fails to decompress pbzip... Rob Landley
