On Tuesday 02 November 2010 19:44:26 Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On Monday 01 November 2010 10:21, Tito wrote: > > On Monday 01 November 2010 02:05:51 Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > > On Sunday 31 October 2010 23:17, Rob Landley wrote: > > > > On Thursday 28 October 2010 16:10:35 Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > > > > On Friday 22 October 2010 20:07, Dan Fandrich wrote: > > > > Snip > >
and snip > > In the past you could tell it in a few words: > > > > 1)small (in the sense that we jump through hops to save a few bytes) > > Still a goal > > > > 2)simple ( Can't say what this means: usually code is simple for the one > > who wrote it and obfuscated for others ;-) ) > > Exactly. What is simple for me is not simple for Rob. > But this is still a goal, and if more people help > to make it simpler, the better. Patches are more useful > than yelling that "this whole thing is getting complicated, > ugly! Why??? AAA!!!!" > > snip Hi, thanks, your words make feel good ;-) So returning to our goals: simple and small, just wanted to remind you about two pending patches that maybe slipped through. One from the obfuscation department about deluser/delgroup: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2010-October/073652.html and one from the simplification department about add/remove shell: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2010-October/073628.html (maybe this one needs more love as it was just a weird idea i had to reduce the code size) Ciao, Tito _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
