On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:03:47PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > Well the issue is that I believe you're breaking one (admittedly > minority, at present) system for the sake of supporting another. This > is hardly progress...
I don't see that--which system would be breaking? Except for one addition of #include <netinet/if_ether.h> (which brings that one file into line with several others), this patch should be practically a no-op. Admittedly, reversing the glibc version check will cause non-Linux systems to start including net/ethernet.h, but those applets are already broken on those systems because they're using Linux-specific features and header files. The only serious case I can think of that might break with this would be alternate libcs on Linux, but given that most aim to be compatible with glibc, which is it? If musl (or any others you're aware of) doesn't have net/ethernet.h, I can add a clause in platform.h for it. >>> Dan _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
