On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 04:18:07PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > Are you sure? Looks like about 50-50 to me. fdatasync, dprintf, > mkdtemp, stpcpy, and strsignal are all standard.
I was talking about the replacement functions in libbb/platform.c and all of those are either nonstandardized, or standardized only in 2008, which is recently enough that plenty of deployed environments don't yet have support. > Anyway, is there a reason this function is useful for BB? It seems > rather useless and bloated to add it for no good reason... It's now used in ls -v, as of a few hours ago. The alternative would be to just surround the -v support with HAVE_STRVERSCMP and not provide a fallback implementation of strverscmp. >>> Dan _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
