On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:57:46PM -0700, Dan Fandrich wrote: > It's now used in ls -v, as of a few hours ago. The alternative would > be to just surround the -v support with HAVE_STRVERSCMP and not > provide a fallback implementation of strverscmp.
I would hope -v support would be a build-time option. I can't see many people wanting to bloat busybox up for this feature... (Even if the libc has strverscmp, using it will increase the binary size for people who static link!) Rich _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
