> if *you* want a minimal POSIX compliant shell out of busybox with no bash > features, you can already do that today. but *your* needs are not the > same as everyone else's
Please stop misunderstanding my needs and misrepresenting my position (voluntarily or not), and read my first message again. I am not opposed to the additions of bashisms to hush, or even ash for that matter. All I am saying is that if hush's objective is to emulate bash and not sh, *this should be made abundantly clear and documented*. People should know exactly what they are getting when they build hush. -- Laurent _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
