On Monday 11 July 2011 10:16, Chris Rees wrote: > I don't see how adding bashisms one-by-one to ash is going to help anyone. > > If you want to run a script under ash, you should write it properly > and test it under ash -- which should be faithful enough to the sh > spec not to tolerate bashisms.
Different situation: If you already have a ton of bash scripts and you has to adapt them all for ash, every implemented bashism makes transition easier. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
