> We're talking about features that are available in scripts that begin
> #!/bin/sh, not features available in scripts that begin #!/bin/bash (or > #!/bin/ash or #!/bin/hush). Just a suggestion that came to mind when reading this: Whould it not be possible to build different applets called ash, hush, bash and even sh depending on the configuration options? I am fully aware that such a bash-applet whould just be 80-90% bash, but still? It would certainly be a nice twist that solved a lot of confusion. AFAIK, currently it would not be possible to build more than one of those "derivate" applets (apart from ash and hush), but that is where we are today anyway. Cheers /Sven _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
