On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Tito <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > just to post a link to this article about a non-GPL > busybox replacement http://lwn.net/Articles/478249/
Some of the arguments from the "other side" found in that thread make sense. We are possibly a bit too aggressive when we try to force people to comply with GPL on other projects too, not only on bbox. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
