On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Rich Felker <[email protected]> wrote: > $ echo hello | busybox sed 's/l*/@/g' > @he@o > $ echo hello | sed 's/l*/@/g' > @h@e@o@ > > The latter is of course correct. My naive diagnosis is that Busybox > sed's 'g' option has an off-by-one error in its next-match search, > i.e. advanced by one character too many before searching for the next > match. >
Which busybox-version? - Sedat - > Rich > _______________________________________________ > busybox mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
