Ralf, On 07/08/2012 03:25 PM, Ralf Friedl wrote: > What I don't understand is why you even consider some kB significant if > you have an USB storage device.
the fact that I use USB storage device doesn't means that I have plenty of room, I have very limited root for the actual boot system. why I cannot use more room, because my boss said so, these are the limitation. > So it seems that you don't want to do what I suggested. if your suggestion is to use dnsip, than again, not an option. > If it is the same binary, as you write, I'm sure you would find that you get > the same > output in both cases. I'm sure you are sure but in reality that is not the case, I get different outputs. > Well, if it's not important for you why you get different outputs from > supposedly the same program, and prefer to blame it on the DHCP server, > or the phase of the moon, I don't see why it should be more important to > other people. I've found a problem and come up with a solution, I've decided on my free time to pitch it to the community so don't be disrespectful because I'm pretty sure that you would not want some to disrespect you. as I don't know what is the issue and the systems most probably differ on the server side but not on the client side, I tend to > I'll give you one last advice anyway. > The output of your system 1 looks exactly like the output from > bind-utils nslookup. So it seems that your system 1 uses a different > nslookup program. again, you are not listening... Eial. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
