So you're telling me that a plain text script which takes more than 300 bytes 
is a better solution than an option that could be configured out?  But your 
full text option, enabled by default, takes less than 300 bytes I suppose?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 18, 2014, at 2:49 PM, Michael Conrad <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/18/2014 3:09 PM, Mike Dean wrote:
>> Helping them with this usually results in grumbling about it being 
>> overcomplicated to perform what should be such a simple task.
> 
> IMHO, the plethora of unix config file syntaxes are much harder to learn than 
> reading a quick manpage (or --help in this case) of the tool you want to run. 
>  Where are they going to learn the syntax? Your documentation? Random 
> Internet documentation for the real ntpd?  The man page for the real ntp.conf 
> is 1700 lines long!
> 
>> On 3/18/2014 3:09 PM, Mike Dean wrote:
>> I personally don't see how this tiny addition represents any significant 
>> increase to the size of the source tree or the compiled binary.
> 
> What syntax should be used?  the full ntpd syntax?  Should busybox emit 
> errors or warnings on directives it doesn't support?  I can't imagine you 
> could add this feature properly in less than 300 bytes, and that is 
> significant for busybox.
> 
>> On 3/18/2014 2:31 PM, Harald Becker wrote:
>> ntpd -p `cat /etc/timeserver`
> 
> I'm inclined to side with Harald that this is the best solution. Can't be 
> much simpler for the user than that...
> 
> -Mike
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to