On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 09:26:27AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:06:07AM +0200, Frank Ihle wrote: > > >> (6) Is there a (stateless/statefull) firewall for BusyBox ? > > > think this is not related to busybox. Use iptables? > > The lack of an iptables command in Busybox is something that would be > nice to fix, especially since the official iptables is bloated and > (last I checked) requires dynamic linking. But this would still not be > "a firewall for Busybox" (because Busybox is NOT AN OS), just an > alternate implementation of the low-level firewall configuration tool.
At one point someone ported iptables to busybox. However, that was in the busybox 1.00/1.1 era, so it's probably missing several bugfixes and features, as well as having a lot of bitrot; it also runs ~14000 lines and requires <rpc/rpc.h>. The copyright notices say (C) 2000-2002. (Rob Landley was not interested.) I found it in this tarball: ftp://ftp.simtreas.ru/pub/my/bb/busybox-1.1.1-vodz-27.tar.gz by editing links from this mail: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2006-May/055122.html On a rather unrelated note, I'm wondering how some of the alternate firewalls compare. HTH, Isaac Dunham _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
