Hi Rich!
> Obviously something like that isn't acceptable for inclusion.
> It was probably just a hacked-up version of upstream iptables.
Just as a question. I did not look into that very deep.
You are talking about iptables. I thought newer kernel have a different
firewall, with a complete different language/interpreter. Is that really
intentional to look still at the old iptables? Wouldn't it be better to
implement applets of the new firewall rules, giving also other users a
push to use the new firewall infrastructure.
--
Harald
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
