On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:57 PM, David Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/20/16, Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:33 PM, David Henderson >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> General idea is described here: >>>> https://busybox.net/~vda/no_ifup.txt >>> >>> Looked at it, wouldn't this be the same thing as scripts in >>> /etc/network/if-*.d directories? >> >> It won't be the same, and the document explains why. >> You did not understand it. >> Example #1: the "ifup -a hangs at boot" case >> Example #2: "ifup eth0" + pppd in parallel simultaneously upping ppp0. >> What will be the default route in "ifup" world? > > So the only difference is to not pass the '-a' switch, but instead to > pass the direct name of the adapter?
No, I'm saying something rather different. It is explained in the link. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
