On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:57 PM, David Henderson
<dhender...@digital-pipe.com> wrote:
> On 9/20/16, Denys Vlasenko <vda.li...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:33 PM, David Henderson
>> <dhender...@digital-pipe.com> wrote:
>>>> General idea is described here:
>>>> https://busybox.net/~vda/no_ifup.txt
>>>
>>> Looked at it, wouldn't this be the same thing as scripts in
>>> /etc/network/if-*.d directories?
>>
>> It won't be the same, and the document explains why.
>> You did not understand it.
>> Example #1: the "ifup -a hangs at boot" case
>> Example #2: "ifup eth0" + pppd in parallel simultaneously upping ppp0.
>> What will be the default route in "ifup" world?
>
> So the only difference is to not pass the '-a' switch, but instead to
> pass the direct name of the adapter?

No, I'm saying something rather different.
It is explained in the link.
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to