On 9/22/16, Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:57 PM, David Henderson > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 9/20/16, Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:33 PM, David Henderson >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> General idea is described here: >>>>> https://busybox.net/~vda/no_ifup.txt >>>> >>>> Looked at it, wouldn't this be the same thing as scripts in >>>> /etc/network/if-*.d directories? >>> >>> It won't be the same, and the document explains why. >>> You did not understand it. >>> Example #1: the "ifup -a hangs at boot" case >>> Example #2: "ifup eth0" + pppd in parallel simultaneously upping ppp0. >>> What will be the default route in "ifup" world? >> >> So the only difference is to not pass the '-a' switch, but instead to >> pass the direct name of the adapter? > > No, I'm saying something rather different. > It is explained in the link. >
I'm trying to understand what it is that you are saying. You keep referring me to the link, but if I don't understand it, I don't think I'm going to without further explanation. I'm currently working on the networking side of a project and am interested in knowing what you're talking about. Dave _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
