On 9/22/16, Denys Vlasenko <vda.li...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:57 PM, David Henderson
> <dhender...@digital-pipe.com> wrote:
>> On 9/20/16, Denys Vlasenko <vda.li...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:33 PM, David Henderson
>>> <dhender...@digital-pipe.com> wrote:
>>>>> General idea is described here:
>>>>> https://busybox.net/~vda/no_ifup.txt
>>>> Looked at it, wouldn't this be the same thing as scripts in
>>>> /etc/network/if-*.d directories?
>>> It won't be the same, and the document explains why.
>>> You did not understand it.
>>> Example #1: the "ifup -a hangs at boot" case
>>> Example #2: "ifup eth0" + pppd in parallel simultaneously upping ppp0.
>>> What will be the default route in "ifup" world?
>> So the only difference is to not pass the '-a' switch, but instead to
>> pass the direct name of the adapter?
> No, I'm saying something rather different.
> It is explained in the link.

I'm trying to understand what it is that you are saying.  You keep
referring me to the link, but if I don't understand it, I don't think
I'm going to without further explanation.  I'm currently working on
the networking side of a project and am interested in knowing what
you're talking about.

busybox mailing list

Reply via email to