>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Moore <[email protected]> writes:

 > Hi,
 > Would it be possible to please make the recent mdev change in v1.26 an
 > option?

 > * mdev (mdev: create devices from /sys/dev) commit 20a3262 (Sep 7, 2016)

 > I am stuck with a v2.6.2x kernel and I am sure other people must be too
 > who have no /sys/dev support in their kernel ?

/sys/dev support got added in 2.6.27-rc1 (July 2008), E.G. ~9 years ago:

commit e105b8bfc769b0545b6f0f395179d1e43cbee822
Author: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon Apr 21 10:51:07 2008 -0700

    sysfs: add /sys/dev/{char,block} to lookup sysfs path by major:minor

    Why?:
    There are occasions where userspace would like to access sysfs
    attributes for a device but it may not know how sysfs has named the
    device or the path.  For example what is the sysfs path for
    /dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST3160827AS_5MT004CK?  With this change a call to
    stat(2) returns the major:minor then userspace can see that
    /sys/dev/block/8:32 links to /sys/block/sdc.

    What are the alternatives?:
    1/ Add an ioctl to return the path: Doable, but sysfs is meant to reduce
       the need to proliferate ioctl interfaces into the kernel, so this
       seems counter productive.

    2/ Use udev to create these symlinks: Also doable, but it adds a
       udev dependency to utilities that might be running in a limited
       environment like an initramfs.

    3/ Do a full-tree search of sysfs.

    [[email protected]: fix duplicate registrations]
    [[email protected]: cleanup suggestions]

    Cc: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
    Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
    Acked-by: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
    Reviewed-by: SL Baur <[email protected]>
    Acked-by: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
    Acked-by: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
    Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
    Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
    Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

Does it really make sense to mix such an ancient kernel with a modern
busybox? Why not just backport this kernel commit?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to