On 2018-09-12 16:06, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > When an application documents that it responds such and such to > SIGRTMIN+n, that almost always means with respect to the libc-provided > SIGRTMIN. Hence I disagree with the "more correct" in commit > 7b276fc17594. In any case, this is rather unfortunate: > > # kill -l RTMIN+2 > 36 > # busybox kill -l RTMIN+2 > 34 > > (the first shell is bash). We probably can't change default behaviour > after 7 years, but at least we can provide a config option.
ping _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
