On 2018-10-05 09:08, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 2018-09-12 16:06, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> When an application documents that it responds such and such to >> SIGRTMIN+n, that almost always means with respect to the libc-provided >> SIGRTMIN. Hence I disagree with the "more correct" in commit >> 7b276fc17594. In any case, this is rather unfortunate: >> >> # kill -l RTMIN+2 >> 36 >> # busybox kill -l RTMIN+2 >> 34 >> >> (the first shell is bash). We probably can't change default behaviour >> after 7 years, but at least we can provide a config option. > > ping
ping2 _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
