On 15 October 2018 22:54:17 CEST, Brandon Enochs <[email protected]> wrote: >Here's the hopefully complete patch:
>> >> Was the memcpy+xstrdup better than the individual stores? Which >version of >> gcc did you try? You didn't answer this. Please send git format-patch patches, including a Signed-off-by statement to clarify copyrights. And please include full bloat-o-meter output (ideally mentioning the compiler, linker, assembler used) for reference. TIA, _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
