On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 10:05 AM tito <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 18:16:41 +0200
> Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 6:55 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 06:15:50PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > > > Can we replace all [s]size_t's with ints/unsigneds? We do not expect
> > > > random pools anywhere near 4 gigabytes...
> > >
> > > Probably that's fine. Is the advantage to tossing out consistent types
> > > worth it though? Does this actually save space? Since [s]size_t is
> > > usually the word size, won't codegen not really change much?
> >
> > For example, on x86-64, 32-bit insns are often shorter.
> > _______________________________________________
> > busybox mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
>
> Hi,
> shouldn't that be "was not" exceeded?
>
> -                * genuine entropy: make sure disk is not full, quota was't 
> esceeded, etc:
> +                * genuine entropy: make sure disk is not full, quota was't 
> exceeded, etc:
>

Yes, a typo. Fixing...
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to