Hi Max.
Am 27.06.24 um 16:11 schrieb Max Pung:
The following leads me to believe that the -F flag should be supported and
valid.
Based on the non-trivial usage comment section from slattach.c:
this...
//usage:#define slattach_trivial_usage
//usage: "[-ehmLF] [-c SCRIPT] [-s BAUD] [-p PROTOCOL] SERIAL_DEVICE"
...and this...
slattach -L -F -p slip -s 115200 /dev/ttyUSB0
The output of running this command is:
Usage: slattach [-ehlLmnqv] [-k keepalive] [-o outfill] [-c cmd] [-s speed] [-p
protocol] tty | -
slattach -V | --version
do not match.
I must be missing something. Any idea what that might be?
My guess is that the slattach command you are running is *not* the one
from busybox but another one.
--
Stefan Seyfried
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over
public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." -- Richard Feynman
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
