Thanks for the responses, I decided to switch to the slattach​ command provided by the net-tools​ recipe in Yocto.
~ Maxwell ________________________________ From: busybox <[email protected]> on behalf of Stefan Seyfried <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2024 6:29 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Trouble determining what is wrong with my usage of the slattach command Hi Max. Am 27.06.24 um 16:11 schrieb Max Pung: > The following leads me to believe that the -F flag should be supported and > valid. > > Based on the non-trivial usage comment section from slattach.c: > this... > //usage:#define slattach_trivial_usage > //usage: "[-ehmLF] [-c SCRIPT] [-s BAUD] [-p PROTOCOL] SERIAL_DEVICE" ...and this... > slattach -L -F -p slip -s 115200 /dev/ttyUSB0 > > The output of running this command is: > > Usage: slattach [-ehlLmnqv] [-k keepalive] [-o outfill] [-c cmd] [-s speed] > [-p protocol] tty | - > slattach -V | --version do not match. > I must be missing something. Any idea what that might be? My guess is that the slattach command you are running is *not* the one from busybox but another one. -- Stefan Seyfried "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." -- Richard Feynman _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flists.busybox.net%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fbusybox&c=E,1,Vz2RifzZh5sqmqnk3yIILX503lWeeuSUB0vAt1TgUmksiUyDG8kYbGGwuGgQEw9PMR5WrddCuQUZANYYHFY6d3Z3mk70CmLPxCp4u08978s2Yt7PDiGq8uLW&typo=1
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
