I have a copy of the jsr303 that the ASF received from Sun/Oracle under
our JCP NDA.  The docs state that the in-container tests are all that
are required to be certified (and JBoss 5.1.0GA is the default
container), but we are also passing all of the stand-alone tests.


-Donald


On 5/21/10 11:44 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> I'd be careful with this. This may also depend on specific license clauses, 
> if the TCK is officially acknowledged by the JSR EG, legal issues, etc.
> 
> We can safely claim that we've passed the TCK published by JBoss, but this 
> doesn't mean that we are now automatically 'officially spec compliant'.
> 
> I haven't looked at the TCK section of JSR-303 yet, but I'd rather check this 
> twice.
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> --- On Fri, 5/21/10, Donald Woods <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> From: Donald Woods <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [DICSUSS] Time for our first release?
>> To: [email protected]
>> Date: Friday, May 21, 2010, 3:17 PM
>> Yes, as long as I use the ASF sourced
>> TCK for the final release run and
>> not the one from JBoss.
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 5/21/10 10:10 AM, Carlos Vara wrote:
>>> Btw, is passing JBoss' TCK enough to claim compliance
>> with the standard?
>>>
>>> Carlos
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Donald Woods <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>> Let's do that in 0.2, along with security profile
>> testing, performance
>>>> testing, samples, ....
>>>>
>>>> Would like to get something out ASAP, so we can
>> get a broader audience
>>>> trying out the codebase and giving us feedback.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Donald
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/21/10 9:14 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>> big +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If it's finally stable enough, I'd also like
>> to start working on BVAL-1 and move all those neat
>> additional validators to an own package.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we do this after the release or
>> before?
>>>>>
>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>> --- On Fri, 5/21/10, Donald Woods <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Donald Woods <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Subject: [DICSUSS] Time for our first
>> release?
>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>> Date: Friday, May 21, 2010, 1:09 PM
>>>>>> Now that we are passing the Bean
>>>>>> Validation TCK in standalone and
>>>>>> incontainer profiles in revision 946990 -
>>>>>>    Standalone tck results -
>>>>>>      Tests run: 244,
>> Failures: 0, Errors: 0,
>>>>>> Skipped: 0
>>>>>>    Incontainer tck results
>> -
>>>>>>      Tests run: 258,
>> Failures: 0, Errors: 0,
>>>>>> Skipped: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it's time for us to consider
>> creating our first
>>>>>> release in the
>>>>>> incubator!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Donald
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
>       
> 

Reply via email to