imo they can join the effort in any case. i won't use project borders as an argument (since we are still within the asf).
regards, gerhard 2011/6/4 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > actually if there are people over at commons interested in helping out, > then this might be a very valuable option. > > However, we need to make sure that there are not too many dependencies > pulled in into bval. > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Sat, 6/4/11, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Kevan Miller <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: Where to, Bean Validation? > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Saturday, June 4, 2011, 6:45 AM > > > > On May 27, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > > > > > Hi all guys, > > > sorry for joining so late the discussion but I got too > > much distracted > > > by apache-commons :P > > > Indeed, I think that Commons would be the perfect > > place to host BVAL, > > > IMHO perfectly fits as commons-validator2. > > > Anyway I don't have any objection on proposing it as > > TLP if the > > > majority thinks that that's BVAL future. > > > > I'm pretty much in agreement with Simone. It seems the > > majority would favor TLP, however -- which is fine, too. > > > > So... if the community wants to graduate, the community > > will need to make it happen... Incubation is not a process > > that lasts forever. We should be moving towards graduation > > -- http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html > > > > --kevan >
