On Jun 4, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > wrote: >> imo they can join the effort in any case. i won't use project borders as an >> argument (since we are still within the asf). > > +1 - commons knew about this incubating effort and could have joined in. > > I would say the only reason to go to commons would be if there were > not enough active people for a TLP to function. If there are then a > TLP would be better IMO.
Agreed. Also, the bar for a sub-project is perhaps a bit lower than a TLP. Either way, the community will need to drive graduation. It won't happen on it's own. --kevan
