Np, just looking for an excuse to _not_ have to touch the instrumentation ClassLoader nightmare in Java which is hitting OpenJPA atm ;)
* http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beanvalidation.html updated in svn (will take some time to being picked up) source in svn: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/beanvalidation.xml * ensure project and product names - I checked trademarkia and others. BVAL is still fine! the other points on the list are perfectly resolved already. I'll go on and send the VOTE with the graduation proposal to [email protected]. LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Matt Benson <[email protected]> > To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2012 9:13 PM > Subject: Re: graduation proposal in the wiki > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> oki, I'm going to ship the VOTE to incubator-general today. >> >> I'll just go through the checklist as listed on the incubator page [1] > first. >> >> >> Thanks again Roman for contributing bval to the ASF! >> Also thanks to Mohammad for preparing the statement and as well to Kevan > for doing the initial preparations and providing oversight in the early days > of > the incubation! > > And thanks to you, Mark, for picking up these final tasks! :) > > Matt > >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 9:55 PM >>> Subject: Re: graduation proposal in the wiki >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> regards, >>> gerhard >>> >>> >>> >>> 2012/1/4 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> For making it easier to review and tweak the proposal, I copied it > over to >>>> out wiki >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BeanValidation/Graduation+Proposal >>>> >>>> I think we can easily start the actual VOTE tomorrow as the > discuss >>>> already turned out well. Any objections? >>>> >>>> >>>> LieGrue, >>>> strub >>>> >>>> >>> >
