I still love my Advanced Class license...been there since Aug 1974 😳

Thought about upgrading to Extra a few times but I wouldn't gain that
much...and  a 1x2 call with my initials would not look good on my license
plates  (N, K or W 5CB?? Nope.... maybe my three  W5CWB but I can get that
now..and I'm trustee of W5APX soooo)

Chris

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023, 8:31 PM Chris Medlin via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org>
wrote:

> Good evening Marc.
> Back in the day, there was novice, technician, general, advanced, and
> extra. Advanced was the hardest test. It was a very hard test. Because
> Advanced was, well, advanced, you didnt need to pass more code. You had the
> 13 wpm for the general and since extra was 20wpm code, the extra written
> was a little easier.
> When they dropped the code requirement, they combined the advanced and
> extra, so the extra test got much harder.
> In the scheme of things, its always been understood that your electronics
> knowledge would have to increase as you progress through the license
> classes.
> If youve taken the extra test 22 times, your approach is flawed.
> Licensing isnt a race. Ive got two friends who were licensed as Novices
> (back during the code requirement) and are still hams today and have no
> desire to upgrade to Tech. They have plenty of enjoyment hanging out doing
> cw.
> And if you are a general class and you aren’t continuing to increase your
> electronics knowledge or cant master the concepts required for the extra,
> you can still have plenty of enjoyment on hf. Theres plenty of spectrum
> alotted for the general class. Ham radio offers many things to everyone.
> The race to Extra shouldnt feel like a requirement.
>
> Hope this helps.
> Welcome to the hobby!
> 73
> Chris
> AC5CM
>
> Typos brought to you by iPhone
>
> > On Mar 20, 2023, at 15:21, M Reiter via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > so maybe this is for the VEC, maybe I am just venting,  It took me 22
> tries to pass the Extra Exam,  I passed the tech on my first try and maybe
> third for general.
> > If I had wanted to be an electrical engineer and design antennas for
> NASA I would have gone to college for that. all I want to do is shoot the
> junk with someone in Australia and ask him or her how the weather is down
> there.   for a small increase in frequencies I am having to learn a huge
> amount of electronic circuit theory.    I feel this is just a bunch of old
> dudes sitting in a room saying to each other " Ya that question will baffle
> them"  and not considering what questions might actually represent what is
> needed to operate a radio.   seriously many operators do not know the
> phonetic alphabet or at least not the reason to use it.  why do I need to
> know the reactance of a pi-l circuit for 7.3 Mhz at 1800 somethings on the
> surface of the moon in September in an odd solar year standing on one foot
> holding an antenna two wavelengths from the surface if there are beetles
> moving underneath and I am left handed.
> >
> > Marc KI5ZHO
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________
> > Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
> >
> > BVARC mailing list
> > BVARC@bvarc.org
> > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> > Publicly available archives are available here:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
> ________________________________________________
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Publicly available archives are available here:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
>
________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 

Reply via email to