On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 13:23 -0600, Robert Citek wrote: > On Feb 8, 2008 9:14 AM, tms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How well does it work with iceweasel? > > I imagine the same. Isn't iceweasel just FF code with the FF name removed?
I'd be happier having tried it out on a grad machine, and knowing it works. Won't have time this weekend, maybe next week? > > I read that one, too. Which is why I pointed out that kids are smart, > > and there is no substitute for parental supervision. > > Yup. But parental controls are easier to install. :) True. It is questionable whether they engender a false sense of security, though, which may be worse than no 'security features' at all. Dunno. I'd like to see it tried and tested. If it works, and if there is enough demand for it, then we can install it on the machines, either by default or when requested. Comments? Suggestions? Thrown vegetables? Theresa
