On Feb 8, 2008 3:29 PM, tms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 13:23 -0600, Robert Citek wrote: > > On Feb 8, 2008 9:14 AM, tms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How well does it work with iceweasel? > > > > I imagine the same. Isn't iceweasel just FF code with the FF name removed? > > I'd be happier having tried it out on a grad machine, and knowing it > works. Won't have time this weekend, maybe next week?
That'd probably be best. > I'd like to see it tried and tested. If it works, and if there is > enough demand for it, then we can install it on the machines, either by > default or when requested. Comments? Suggestions? Thrown vegetables? If it works, then install it, but keep it disabled. If they ask, then tell. Regards, - Robert
