Elliot Murphy wrote:
> On 06/04/2008 12:26 PM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > However, catching all exceptions is going to hide a lot of valid
> > errors and that will be confusing for users that do want to use the
> > seahorse support.
>
> Thanks for the comments! I disagree that crashing visualize is a better
> tradeoff than disabling seahorse.
I disagree with your disagreement: crashing lets you know that something
is wrong and needs addressing, while silently ignoring errors more often
than not leads to behaviour that appears to be influenced by the phases
of the moon and voodoo ("successfully failed to get key from seahorse,
here is an empty one, anyway").
> This is only capturing errors that
> happen while loading. It leaves a very bad impression for users of
> bzr-gtk when this crashes.
well, any kind of feedback is good, as long as the backtrace is included ;)
--
bzr-gtk mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.canonical.com/mailman/listinfo/bzr-gtk
