On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 09:18:59 -0700 (PDT) Mark Crispin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MC> Some people have extended mh format to have a place to store flags, but MC> this is effectively a different format. The only reason to use mh is to MC> interoperate with the ancient mh program. Otherwise, you should use some MC> other format. But MH is the only format among those supported by c-client (except support for it is so poor that it is unusable in practice) which supports folders having both messages and subfolders. It is also "plain text" (and so is preferrable to MBX) and vastly faster than MBOX. For these reasons, it would be a great format to use for me -- if only the driver for it had flags support. Regards, VZ -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/imap/c-client-list.html ------------------------------------------------------------------
