I could not find time to pack this as of late. But will do over this weekend.
Thanks for all the feedback! On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura < danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dinesh, > > That in fact is the default behavior even now. The issue is with building > NTLM samples by default. > > Danushka > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Dinesh Weerapurage <xydin...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I would think, it might be better to disable it for the default setting >> (like in linux) and give user an option of enabling. >> >> Dinesh. >> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Nandika Jayawardana >> <jayaw...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> To disable NTML building on windows, just set both NTLM options to 0 in >>> the configure.in file. >>> >>> Regards >>> Nandika >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>> danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I got the following error while building the RC4 pack on Windows. >>>> >>>> c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: >>>> '..\..\samples\client\ntlm\ntlm_post.c': No such fi >>>> le or directory >>>> c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: >>>> '..\..\samples\client\ntlm\ntlm_util.c': No such fi >>>> le or directory >>>> >>>> BTW how should I disable building NTLM?. Is it not optional?. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Danushka >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Dinesh Weerapurage >>>> <xydin...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Just tried to test RC4 looks like we are missing test directory. >>>>> Couldn't pass ./configure , error as follows >>>>> >>>>> config.status: creating src/modules/mod_log/Makefile >>>>> config.status: error: cannot find input file: `test/Makefile.in' >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> Dinesh. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe < >>>>> samisa.abeysin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Will pack again. >>>>>> >>>>>> Samisa... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Nandika Jayawardana < >>>>>> jayaw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It seems I forgot to commit the SSL compilation error fix to the >>>>>>> trunk. I committed the .fix just now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Nandika >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe < >>>>>>> samisa.abeysin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here are the packs with the reported issues resolved: >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~samisa/axis2c-1.7.0-RC4/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Samisa... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe >>>>>>>> <sam...@wso2.com>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Samisa, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Apparently the source pack is corrupt. I tried to extract it on >>>>>>>>>> Windows but failed. Please check. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Um, did you try to extract tar on windows? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Danushka >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe < >>>>>>>>>> sam...@wso2.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~samisa/axis2c-1.7.0-RC3/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have the source and Linux binary pack in there. I need someone >>>>>>>>>>> to help with the Windows pack. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I applied all patches that I could to this pack. So we are almost >>>>>>>>>>> ready to go after a test round. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> Samisa... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe < >>>>>>>>>>> sam...@wso2.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I just had a look at these pathces, and it seems to me that >>>>>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>>>>> would not be any side effects. So I am +1 to ship these patches. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Samisa... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 1, 2010, Steve Leland < >>>>>>>>>>>> st...@pouchapond.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> > During the 8 years I was on the Domino web server team I never >>>>>>>>>>>> really appreciated customers telling me what my top priority >>>>>>>>>>>> should be - and >>>>>>>>>>>> now that I'm on the other side, as your customer, I don't want to >>>>>>>>>>>> make the >>>>>>>>>>>> same mistake. But it looks like you are close to calling for a >>>>>>>>>>>> vote on 1.7, >>>>>>>>>>>> and I think there's something that might have been overlooked - I >>>>>>>>>>>> hope >>>>>>>>>>>> bringing it up via this list is OK. >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > BinaryTree ships a product that uses Axis2c 1.6, and staticly >>>>>>>>>>>> links in OpenSSL (since Domino installs with its own versions of >>>>>>>>>>>> the OpenSSL >>>>>>>>>>>> dlls). I spent a considerable amount time getting it to run >>>>>>>>>>>> without leaking >>>>>>>>>>>> any memory. When the time comes, it will be much easier to >>>>>>>>>>>> convince the >>>>>>>>>>>> boss to upgrade to 1.7 if I don't have to go through that again. >>>>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>>>> biggest leak I found had already been reported in JIRA -1237 - and >>>>>>>>>>>> I added 3 >>>>>>>>>>>> very small patches to fix it. >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > I know that's not your top priority, but it's one of mine - >>>>>>>>>>>> could I just put in a plea that you consider them for the 1.7 >>>>>>>>>>>> release? >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > [ >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-1237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12883168#action_12883168] >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> > Steve Leland >>>>>>>>>>>> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Selvaratnam >>>>>>>>>>>> Uthaiyashankar" <uthaiyashan...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> > To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <c-dev@axis.apache.org>; >>>>>>>>>>>> "Apache AXIS C User List" <c-u...@axis.apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>> > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 2:04 AM >>>>>>>>>>>> > Subject: Axis2/C 1.7.0 - RC2 >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi Devs, >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > You can find Axis2/C RC2 in [1]. Please test and give your >>>>>>>>>>>> feedback. >>>>>>>>>>>> > RAT report is in [2]. There are some files[3] (mostly visual >>>>>>>>>>>> studio >>>>>>>>>>>> > project files) excluded from the RAT report. Also, generated >>>>>>>>>>>> API >>>>>>>>>>>> > documents (doxygen documents) and Makefile.in files are not >>>>>>>>>>>> having any >>>>>>>>>>>> > headers. Since they are generated files, we can omit them. >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > If they are fine, can start a format voting thread. >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> > Shankar >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > [1] http://people.apache.org/~shankar/axis2c/1.7.0-RC2/ >>>>>>>>>>>> > [2] >>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/axis2c/1.7.0-RC2/rat-report.txt >>>>>>>>>>>> > [3] >>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/axis2c/1.7.0-RC2/rat-avoid.txt >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>>>>>>> > S.Uthaiyashankar >>>>>>>>>>>> > Senior Software Architect >>>>>>>>>>>> > WSO2 Inc. >>>>>>>>>>>> > http://wso2.com/ - "lean . enterprise . middleware" >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-user-unsubscr...@axis.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: c-user-h...@axis.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@axis.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@axis.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
