On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Nandika Jayawardana <jayaw...@gmail.com>wrote:
> There are quite a few jiras with patches attached. I think its better if > we can get those tested and committed for the release. +1. Will do that. I fixed minor issues over the weekend for next RC. I will host that RC anyway. > Regards > Nandika > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe < > samisa.abeysin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sorry, I was out and was under the snow for a while. >> >> Planning to come up with a build this weekend. >> >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Scott Bostater >> <scott.bosta...@jda.com>wrote: >> >>> Any estimates on when RC4 will be released? **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *Scott Bostater >>> **770-701-3622 >>> www.jda.com* >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:samisa.abeysin...@gmail.com] >>> *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2011 10:44 AM >>> >>> *To:* Apache AXIS C Developers List >>> *Subject:* Re: Axis2/C 1.7.0 - RC4**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> I have had no time so far to attend this :(**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I will build the packs somehow over this weekend. **** >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe < >>> samisa.abeysin...@gmail.com> wrote:**** >>> >>> I could not find time to pack this as of late. But will do over this >>> weekend. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Thanks for all the feedback!**** >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>> danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com> wrote:**** >>> >>> Dinesh, >>> >>> That in fact is the default behavior even now. The issue is with >>> building NTLM samples by default. >>> >>> Danushka**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Dinesh Weerapurage <xydin...@gmail.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> I would think, it might be better to disable it for the default setting >>> (like in linux) and give user an option of enabling.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Dinesh.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Nandika Jayawardana <jayaw...@gmail.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> To disable NTML building on windows, just set both NTLM options to 0 in >>> the configure.in file. >>> >>> Regards >>> Nandika**** >>> >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>> danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com> wrote:**** >>> >>> I got the following error while building the RC4 pack on Windows. >>> >>> c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: >>> '..\..\samples\client\ntlm\ntlm_post.c': No such fi >>> le or directory >>> c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: >>> '..\..\samples\client\ntlm\ntlm_util.c': No such fi >>> le or directory >>> >>> BTW how should I disable building NTLM?. Is it not optional?. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Danushka**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Dinesh Weerapurage <xydin...@gmail.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> Just tried to test RC4 looks like we are missing test directory. >>> Couldn't pass ./configure , error as follows**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> config.status: creating src/modules/mod_log/Makefile**** >>> >>> config.status: error: cannot find input file: `test/Makefile.in'**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> thanks,**** >>> >>> Dinesh.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe < >>> samisa.abeysin...@gmail.com> wrote:**** >>> >>> Will pack again.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Samisa...**** >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Nandika Jayawardana <jayaw...@gmail.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> It seems I forgot to commit the SSL compilation error fix to the trunk. >>> I committed the .fix just now. >>> >>> Regards >>> Nandika**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe < >>> samisa.abeysin...@gmail.com> wrote:**** >>> >>> Here are the packs with the reported issues resolved: >>> http://people.apache.org/~samisa/axis2c-1.7.0-RC4/ >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Samisa...**** >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe <sam...@wso2.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>> danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com> wrote:**** >>> >>> Hi Samisa, >>> >>> Apparently the source pack is corrupt. I tried to extract it on Windows >>> but failed. Please check.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Um, did you try to extract tar on windows?**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Danushka**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <sam...@wso2.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~samisa/axis2c-1.7.0-RC3/**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> I have the source and Linux binary pack in there. I need someone to help >>> with the Windows pack. **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> I applied all patches that I could to this pack. So we are almost ready >>> to go after a test round. **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Thanks,**** >>> >>> Samisa...**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <sam...@wso2.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> I just had a look at these pathces, and it seems to me that there >>> would not be any side effects. So I am +1 to ship these patches. >>> >>> Samisa...**** >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, September 1, 2010, Steve Leland <st...@pouchapond.com> >>> wrote: >>> > During the 8 years I was on the Domino web server team I never really >>> appreciated customers telling me what my top priority should be - and now >>> that I'm on the other side, as your customer, I don't want to make the same >>> mistake. But it looks like you are close to calling for a vote on 1.7, and >>> I think there's something that might have been overlooked - I hope bringing >>> it up via this list is OK. >>> > >>> > BinaryTree ships a product that uses Axis2c 1.6, and staticly links in >>> OpenSSL (since Domino installs with its own versions of the OpenSSL dlls). >>> I spent a considerable amount time getting it to run without leaking any >>> memory. When the time comes, it will be much easier to convince the boss >>> to upgrade to 1.7 if I don't have to go through that again. The biggest >>> leak I found had already been reported in JIRA -1237 - and I added 3 very >>> small patches to fix it. >>> > >>> > I know that's not your top priority, but it's one of mine - could I >>> just put in a plea that you consider them for the 1.7 release? >>> > >>> > [ >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-1237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12883168#action_12883168] >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > Steve Leland >>> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar" < >>> uthaiyashan...@gmail.com> >>> > To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <c-dev@axis.apache.org>; "Apache >>> AXIS C User List" <c-u...@axis.apache.org> >>> > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 2:04 AM >>> > Subject: Axis2/C 1.7.0 - RC2 >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Hi Devs, >>> > >>> > You can find Axis2/C RC2 in [1]. Please test and give your feedback. >>> > RAT report is in [2]. There are some files[3] (mostly visual studio >>> > project files) excluded from the RAT report. Also, generated API >>> > documents (doxygen documents) and Makefile.in files are not having any >>> > headers. Since they are generated files, we can omit them. >>> > >>> > If they are fine, can start a format voting thread. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > Shankar >>> > >>> > [1] http://people.apache.org/~shankar/axis2c/1.7.0-RC2/ >>> > [2] http://people.apache.org/~shankar/axis2c/1.7.0-RC2/rat-report.txt >>> > [3] http://people.apache.org/~shankar/axis2c/1.7.0-RC2/rat-avoid.txt >>> > >>> > -- >>> > S.Uthaiyashankar >>> > Senior Software Architect >>> > WSO2 Inc. >>> > http://wso2.com/ - "lean . enterprise . middleware" >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-user-unsubscr...@axis.apache.org >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: c-user-h...@axis.apache.org >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@axis.apache.org >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@axis.apache.org >>> > >>> >**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >> >> >
