Jesse Pelton wrote:
> To my mind, the ideal 2.7 release would fix all known bugs and
> introduce no new (possibly buggy) features. �That's probably not
> practical, but it might be something to shoot for.
Hi all,
I'd like to help shooting bugs. Can anybody tell me which issue(s) I
should pick up in order to achieve maximum helpfulness? Possibly, it
should be something I'm able to test, that is Linux and cygwin.
> The final argument for 2.7: the last release in the 1.x series was
> 1.7. Maybe there's something special about .7, or maybe there's a
> tradition developing here, or maybe Xerces developers count in base 8
> ("... 1.5, 1.6, 1.7 ... umm ... 2.0!").
:)
Cheers,
Axel
--
Humboldt-Universit�t zu Berlin
Institut f�r Informatik
Signalverarbeitung und Mustererkennung
Dipl.-Inf. Axel Wei�
Rudower Chaussee 25
12489 Berlin-Adlershof
+49-30-2093-3050
** www.freesp.de **
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
