[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12521813
]
Scott Cantor commented on XERCESC-1740:
---------------------------------------
1. Quite possible, I haven't spent much time worrying about the samples, it was
enough of a challenge just getting things to build. ;-)
2. I don't know, I commented it out because I wanted to verify that the right
symlinks are created without it. If it's still needed, there's a serious bug in
the install process somewhere, but I don't see any sign that it's needed
anymore. One would have to ask the original author.
BTW, one change I did make was to fix the fact that the .so link is only
packaged into the devel RPM, rather than the base RPM. That should fix
co-existence, since people need to be able to install multiple versions, but
only one devel copy. But I didn't test that.
> RPM spec file missing 64-bit support
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: XERCESC-1740
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1740
> Project: Xerces-C++
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Build
> Affects Versions: 2.7.0
> Environment: CentOS (RHEL) 5, x86_64
> Reporter: Scott Cantor
> Attachments: xerces-c.spec.patch
>
>
> The spec file, when tweaked to fix other issues, does build, but produces a
> 32-bit library. Making it support 64-bit requires both runConfigure changes
> and fixes to the library install process.
> I will attempt to attach a patch if I can come up with one that isn't a
> complete rewrite, but I do have a working spec file for 2.7.0 that is rather
> different as well.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
