On 7/16/20, 8:07 AM, "Francesco Pretto" <cez...@gmail.com> wrote:

>    Thank you, and thank you for frankness! Probably of the two the utf-8
>    for internal encoding would be more oriented towards c++ modernization
>    changes, as you said, but probably a big change touching all the code
>    base.

It's massive. What Roger is doing is making XMLChar work as char16_t. That 
eliminates a lot of problems with literals and STL integration, but it doesn’t 
change the fact that virtually every other C or older C++ library still won't 
integrate well.

-- Scott



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org

Reply via email to