> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
> Mickey Mathieson
> Envoyé : vendredi 16 mars 2007 13:35
> À : [email protected]
> Objet : Re: [c-prog] Recursion - Reverse String Example
> 
> 
> There was a question in a previous post. I don't
> recall using all caps - maybe a few words were caps
> but never the complete sentences.
> 
> as far as challenging people - if they could come up
> with a better solution (with out changing calling
> convention) then lets see it. I don't see the problem
> in this.


It was not clear that you can't change the main function declaration
(convention? Firstly I thought about stdcall, ... )
Just for fun... RevStr did not change but call a better recursive
function mostly for storing the initial string size.


char* reverse_r( char*, char* );

char *RevStr(int count, char *str)
{
  return reverse_r( str, str + count - 1 );
}

char* reverse_r( char* begin, char* end )
{
  if ( end <= begin ) return begin;
  char c = *end; *end = *begin; *begin = c; //swap
  reverse_r( begin+1, end-1 );
  return begin;
}

Regards,
David

 

  ----------

Ce message et ses pièces jointes (le "message") est destiné à l'usage    
exclusif de son destinataire.                                            
Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en aviser immédiatement   
l'expéditeur  et de le détruire ensuite. Le présent message  pouvant  
être altéré à notre insu,  CALYON Crédit Agricole CIB                           
   
ne peut pas être engagé par son contenu. Tous droits réservés. 
          
This message and/or any  attachments (the "message") is intended for     
the sole use of its addressee.                                            
If you are not the addressee, please immediately notify the sender and    
then destroy the message.  As this message and/or any attachments may 
have been altered without our knowledge,  its content  is not legally 
binding on CALYON Crédit Agricole CIB. All rights reserved.                     
                                           


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to