Nico Heinze wrote:
> --- In [email protected], Knowledge Seeker
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Nico Heinze wrote:
>>
>>> --- In [email protected], Knowledge Seeker
>>> <knowledgeseeker78@> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> There will be no output ... as your program will
>>>> fail to compile !!
>>>>
>>>> ranjan kumar ojha wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> #include<cstdio>
>>>>> int main()
>>>>> {
>>>>> char *s="\12345s\n";
>>>>> print("%d",sizeof(s));
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> what will be output of above program and why ????
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> KnowledgeSeeker,
>>> if you're complaining about the "return o" instead of
>>> "return 0" or the "#include <cstdio>", you're of course
>>> correct, but this won't help Ranjan anyway
>>>
>>>
>> No offense intended Nico, but what i wanted to convey to OP
>> is that he has not even taken any pains to try the problem
>> first hand. The groups is for help and not for spoon-feeding.
>>
> <snip>
>
> Hi,
> I totally understand and support your point, but what did your
> (correct) complaint help him to learn?
> I have misexpressed myself by choosing too hard a wording, and for
> that I apologise. What I meant to say is that we should use such a
> chance to teach other people how to behave better:
> 1) that compiling the program on his own computer will at
> least give him some hint about potential answers.
> 2) that mentioning his own thoughts about the correct answers
> makes more sense than just asking something.
>
> Sorry for the misunderstanding I have caused this way.
>
No problem pal.
May be I should have simply asked the OP to compile the program first. I
think I initiated using wrong expression.
> Regards,
> Nico
>
>
>
