Wow! You didn't have to go to all that trouble, but thank you!

--- In [email protected], Charles Richmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2008, at 10:52 PM, Charles Richmond wrote:
> 
> >
> > From: Vic Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: January 17, 2008 11:38:18 PM CST
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [c-prog] Well, I did it!
> > Reply-To: [email protected]
> >
> >
> > onecrazeemom wrote:
> >> I finally completed the dice roll program. Now, what do I do to make
> >> the rolls more random? They seem to come up with doubles quite often.
> >> I used srand( time(0)) to get my random numbers. I used the modulus(I
> >> think that is what it is called)
> >>
> >> dieOne = 1 + rand() %6;
> >> dieTwo = 1 + rand() %6;
> >>
> >> srand( time(0) );
> >>
> >> Just curious what gives you a true random number when the lines of
> >> code are run so close together. Here are a couple of rolls:
> >>
> >> 1. 3, 1
> >> 2. 6, 1
> >> 3. 6, 2
> >> 4. 5, 5
> >> 5. 1, 1
> >> 6. 3, 4
> >> 7. 4, 6
> >>
> >> I guess they are more random than I thought, but the first two  
> >> times I
> >> ran the program it came up with doubles.
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >> Stephanie
> > You should be using srand(time(0));  only ONCE in your program.
> > and if you do the math, you'll find that about 1/6 of the rolls  
> > will be
> > "doubles"
> >
> 
> 
> Here is the table of how two dice can combine:
> 
>    | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
> --+---+---+---+---+---+---+
> 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
> --+---+---+---+---+---+---+
> 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
> --+---+---+---+---+---+---+
> 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
> --+---+---+---+---+---+---+
> 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |10 |
> --+---+---+---+---+---+---+
> 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |10 |11 |
> --+---+---+---+---+---+---+
> 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |10 |11 |12 |
> --+---+---+---+---+---+---+
> 
> 
> The main diagonal from upper left to lower right... represents the
> six doubles that can be rolled. Six out of thirty-six is one out of six.
> So one out of six times (on average) you *should* roll a double.
> 
> --
> +----------------------------------------------------------------+
> |   Charles and Francis Richmond     richmond at plano dot net   |
> +----------------------------------------------------------------+
>


Reply via email to